I was put in Facebook jail for 24hrs yesterday for this meme. No option to disagree, contest, request review, or communicate with the fb overlord moderation staff. I would like the audiences thoughts in the validity of suspension for this meme, and the factual nature of what it says.

What should allow sarcasm to posted? Require #sarcasm or something? What should allow mostly truths? #prettydamntrue? Then the fb moderation overlords know this is not meant to be some declarative of 100% fact? Then fact that they remove these post and suspend people like I is also confusing, because it's an admission of OUR authority. If we were not popular or believed or followed, then there would be no need to make the effort to punish us, right? So then why is not a hierarchy, of upgrade in account where now someone like I has a raise in level of account, holding me to a higher standard? This would inherently make me police myself more, making sure that I tried to abide by the standards of the rise in account authority give, with some sort of badge.

If these ideas are seen to be unfsctual, also why remove it entirely? They leave the obsurdly sarcastic, exaggerated, comedic ones because there so clearly off base, that they put a cover shroud over it and link to their authoritative alleged to be believed as factual link to article. When they are removed entirely, wouldn't this mean that there is a smaller or no gap between facts and censorship of truth? 🤔

I genuinely am requesting support in thinking and discussing these questions in hope of what we find be close enough answers, and Facebook to stop removing options for me to request review. I genuinely want to know how this non factual, when cabbage recalls are true, the jabb-o-la injuries are true, more than injuries are true, backed by data, no news is covered of these side effects and causation, and no recall has been performed.

WE literally have non debatable paperwork that p-fiz-er KNEW the med was no where near the Efficacy claimed in marketing and programming narrative, and stated quite literally it was actually only known to be effective in the 2x% range....

Please, for the love of all things logical and realistic for growth and understanding to try and be better each day, help me understand these questions!

Cheers 😉

https://locals.MassStash.com
Follow me here where they don't have a totalitarian regime taking down my posts without discourse or logical reasoning review.